KOMPARASI PENERAPAN PRINSIP KONSERVATISME PADA AKUNTANSI KONVENSIONAL DAN AKUNTANSI SYARIAH

  • ANITA WAHYU ALVIANI IAIN SALATIGA
  • HUSNUL KHOTIMAH IAIN SALATIGA
  • YOLANDA SRYTA PRADANI IAIN SALATIGA
  • AHMAD ULIL ALBAB AL UMAR IAIN SALATIGA
  • NUR KABIB IAIN SALATIGA
Keywords: Conservatism, Conventional Accounting, Sharia Accounting.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze whether there is difference between conservatism of conventional accounting and sharia accounting. Conservatism is an important principle in financial reporting which can be seen on how an entity recognize an earning increase with delay while they recognize an earning decrease on timely basis. Conservatism is a prudent reaction in accounting. From the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that there is no significant difference between accounting conservatism in conventional accounting and sharia accounting. But I found that sharia accounting report the transactions more conservatively than the conventional one. Differences in the level of conservatism in Sharia Commercial Banks and Conventional Commercial Banks are influenced by the higher litigation risk that is faced by the Sharia Commercial Banks and the obligation to pay Zakah.

 

Published
2020-03-04
How to Cite
ANITA WAHYU ALVIANI, HUSNUL KHOTIMAH, YOLANDA SRYTA PRADANI, AHMAD ULIL ALBAB AL UMAR, & NUR KABIB. (2020). KOMPARASI PENERAPAN PRINSIP KONSERVATISME PADA AKUNTANSI KONVENSIONAL DAN AKUNTANSI SYARIAH . JURNAL EKONOMI, SOSIAL & HUMANIORA, 1(08), 12-19. Retrieved from https://jurnalintelektiva.com/index.php/jurnal/article/view/96
Issue
Vol 1 No 08 (2020): INTELEKTIVA : Jurnal Ekonomi, Sosial dan Humaniora E-ISSN 2686-5661
Section
Articles